Understanding Sovereignty through Kelsen/Schmitt


Autoria(s): Suganami, Hidemi
Contribuinte(s)

Department of International Politics

Data(s)

10/11/2008

10/11/2008

01/07/2007

Resumo

Suganami, Hidemi, 'Understanding Sovereignty through Kelsen/Schmitt', Review of International Studies (2007) 33(3) pp.511-530 RAE2008

Kelsen and Schmitt, two leading legal theorists of the twentieth century, constitute a powerful pair that sheds light on the intertwining of politics and law in the phenomenon of sovereignty. Although their conceptions of sovereignty are far apart, they are interconnected as different ways of making sense of the same social phenomenon, or what I call the ?practice of sovereignty?, whereby an ultimately unauthorised authority continuously authorises itself as the authority and the rest by and large accept this, acquiesce in this, or are made to do so. Having clarified their differences and interconnection, I explore some of the implications of the two writers? differing conceptions of sovereignty and of the practice of sovereignty that underlie them.

Peer reviewed

Formato

20

Identificador

Suganami , H 2007 , ' Understanding Sovereignty through Kelsen/Schmitt ' Review of International Studies , vol 33 , no. 3 , pp. 511-530 . DOI: 10.1017/S0260210507007632

0260-2105

PURE: 80593

PURE UUID: 4aca9735-1806-441f-a329-3eaf2e25204e

dspace: 2160/969

http://hdl.handle.net/2160/969

http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007632

Idioma(s)

eng

Relação

Review of International Studies

Tipo

/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article

Direitos