Comparison of partial extraction reagents for assessing potential bioavailability of heavy metals in sediments


Autoria(s): Brady, James P.; Kinaev, Irina; Goonetilleke, Ashantha; Ayoko, Godwin A.
Data(s)

01/05/2016

Resumo

Assessment of heavy metal bioavailability in sediments is complex because of the number of partial extraction methods available for the assessment and the general lack of certified reference materials. This study evaluates five different extraction methodologies to ascertain the relative strengths and weaknesses of each method. The results are then compared to previously published work to ascertain the most effective partial extraction technique, which was established to be dilute (0.75 – 1 M) nitric acid solutions. These results imply that single reagent; weak acid extractions provide a better assessment of potentially bioavailable metals than the chelating agents used in sequential extraction methods.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/95582/

Publicador

Elsevier

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/95582/1/Comparison%20of%20partial%20extraction%20reagents%20for%20assessing%20potential%20bioavailability%20of%20heavy%20metals%20in%20sediments.pdf

DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.03.029

Brady, James P., Kinaev, Irina, Goonetilleke, Ashantha, & Ayoko, Godwin A. (2016) Comparison of partial extraction reagents for assessing potential bioavailability of heavy metals in sediments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 106(1-2), pp. 329-334.

Direitos

2016 Elsevier

Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution; Non-Commercial; No-Derivatives 4.0 International. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.03.029

Fonte

School of Chemistry, Physics & Mechanical Engineering; School of Civil Engineering & Built Environment; Institute for Future Environments; Science & Engineering Faculty

Palavras-Chave #090508 Water Quality Engineering #Heavy metals #partial extraction #sequential extraction #contamination
Tipo

Journal Article