Comparison of partial extraction reagents for assessing potential bioavailability of heavy metals in sediments
Data(s) |
01/05/2016
|
---|---|
Resumo |
Assessment of heavy metal bioavailability in sediments is complex because of the number of partial extraction methods available for the assessment and the general lack of certified reference materials. This study evaluates five different extraction methodologies to ascertain the relative strengths and weaknesses of each method. The results are then compared to previously published work to ascertain the most effective partial extraction technique, which was established to be dilute (0.75 – 1 M) nitric acid solutions. These results imply that single reagent; weak acid extractions provide a better assessment of potentially bioavailable metals than the chelating agents used in sequential extraction methods. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Elsevier |
Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/95582/1/Comparison%20of%20partial%20extraction%20reagents%20for%20assessing%20potential%20bioavailability%20of%20heavy%20metals%20in%20sediments.pdf DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.03.029 Brady, James P., Kinaev, Irina, Goonetilleke, Ashantha, & Ayoko, Godwin A. (2016) Comparison of partial extraction reagents for assessing potential bioavailability of heavy metals in sediments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 106(1-2), pp. 329-334. |
Direitos |
2016 Elsevier Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution; Non-Commercial; No-Derivatives 4.0 International. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.03.029 |
Fonte |
School of Chemistry, Physics & Mechanical Engineering; School of Civil Engineering & Built Environment; Institute for Future Environments; Science & Engineering Faculty |
Palavras-Chave | #090508 Water Quality Engineering #Heavy metals #partial extraction #sequential extraction #contamination |
Tipo |
Journal Article |