Should we extend 'Care' or 'care'?
| Data(s) |
01/02/2016
|
|---|---|
| Resumo |
A discursive article examining the proposition that provisions for young people in care should be formally extended beyond their 18th birthday when care normally ends. Debate exists as to whether this should include a legislative extension to Care as has happened in some overseas jurisdictions or whether it is more appropriate to simply extend access to dedicated support provisions. The article concludes that both may have a place as long as the complexity of young people's situations is adequately responded to. |
| Formato |
application/pdf |
| Identificador | |
| Publicador |
Council To Homeless Persons |
| Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/95441/1/__qut.edu.au_Documents_StaffHome_staffgroupC%24_crane_Documents_aa%20writing%20and%20research_Parity_Crane%20article%20Parity_Vol29-01.pdf http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=977564334040275;res=IELHSS Crane, Philip R. (2016) Should we extend 'Care' or 'care'? Parity, 29(1), pp. 6-8. |
| Direitos |
Copyright 2016 The Author Permission given by Parity for this article to be reproduced. |
| Fonte |
Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation; School of Public Health & Social Work |
| Palavras-Chave | #Leaving care #Extending care #Youth homelessness |
| Tipo |
Journal Article |
