School policies on bullying and cyberbullying: Perspectives across three Australian states


Autoria(s): Chalmers, Caitlin; Campbell, Marilyn A.; Spears, Barbara; Butler, Desmond A.; Cross, Donna; Slee, Phillip; Kift, Sally M.
Data(s)

2016

Resumo

Background Despite decades of research, bullying in all its forms is still a significant problem within schools in Australia, as it is internationally. Anti-bullying policies and guidelines are thought to be one strategy as part of a whole school approach to reduce bullying. However, although Australian schools are required to have these policies, their effectiveness is not clear. As policies and guidelines about bullying and cyberbullying are developed within education departments, this paper explores the perspectives of those who are involved in their construction. Purpose This study examined the perspectives of professionals involved in policy construction, across three different Australian states. The aim was to determine how their relative jurisdictions define bullying and cyberbullying, the processes for developing policy, the bullying prevention and intervention recommendations given to schools and the content considered essential in current policies. Sample Eleven key stakeholders from three Australian states with similar education systems were invited to participate. The sample selection criteria included professionals with experience and training in education, cyber-safety and the responsibility to contribute to or make decisions which inform policy in this area for schools in their state. Design and methods Participants were interviewed about the definitions of bullying they used in their state policy frameworks; the extent to which cyberbullying was included; and the content they considered essential for schools to include in anti-bullying policies. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analysed thematically. Findings Seven themes were identified in the data: - (1) Definition of bullying and cyberbullying; - (2) Existence of a policy template; - (3) Policy location; - (4) Adding cyberbullying; - (5) Distinguishing between bullying and cyberbullying; - (6) Effective policy, and; - (7) Policy as a prevention or intervention tool. The results were similar both across state boundaries and also across different disciplines. Conclusion Analysis of the data suggested that, across the themes, there was some lack of information about bullying and cyberbullying. This limitation could affect the subsequent development, dissemination and sustainability of school anti-bullying policies, which have implications for the translation of research to inform better student outcomes.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/92797/

Publicador

Taylor & Francis Group

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/92797/3/92797.pdf

DOI:10.1080/00131881.2015.1129114

Chalmers, Caitlin, Campbell, Marilyn A., Spears, Barbara, Butler, Desmond A., Cross, Donna, Slee, Phillip, & Kift, Sally M. (2016) School policies on bullying and cyberbullying: Perspectives across three Australian states. Educational Researcher, 58(1), pp. 91-109.

Fonte

School of Cultural & Professional Learning; Faculty of Education; Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #130305 Educational Counselling #130399 Specialist Studies in Education not elsewhere classified #Bullying #Policies #Schools #Cyberbullying
Tipo

Journal Article