Development, reliability and validity of the queensland evaluation of wheelchair skills (QEWS)


Autoria(s): Gollan, E.J.; Harvey, L.A.; Simmons, J.; Adams, R.; McPhail, S.M.
Data(s)

01/10/2015

Resumo

- Objectives To develop and test a valid and reliable assessment of wheelchair skills for individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI); the Queensland Evaluation of Wheelchair Skills (QEWS). - Setting Hospital, Australia. - Methods Phase 1: Four Delphi panel rounds with clinical experts were used to develop the QEWS. Phase 2: Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the QEWS items were examined in 100 people with SCI. Phase 3a: Concurrent validity was investigated by examining the association between QEWS total scores and physiotherapists’ global ratings of wheelchair skill performance. Phase 3b: Construct validity was tested in 20 people with recent SCI by examining change in QEWS total scores between when they first mobilised in a wheelchair and scores obtained 10 weeks later. - Results Phase 1: The QEWS was developed. Phase 2: The intra-class correlation coefficients reflecting the intra-rater reliability and the inter-rater reliability for the QEWS total score were 1.00 and 0.98, with scores being within one point of each other 96 and 91% of the time, respectively. Phase 3a: The QEWS total scores were comparable with the global rating of wheelchair skill performance (r2=0.93). Phase 3b: The QEWS scores changed by a median (interquartile range (IQR)) of 4 (1 to 6) points over the 10-week period following first wheelchair mobilisation. - Conclusion The QEWS is a valid and reliable tool for measuring wheelchair skills in individuals with SCI. The QEWS is efficient and practical to administer and does not require specialised equipment.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/92694/

Publicador

Nature Publishing Group

Relação

DOI:10.1038/sc.2015.82

Gollan, E.J., Harvey, L.A., Simmons, J., Adams, R., & McPhail, S.M. (2015) Development, reliability and validity of the queensland evaluation of wheelchair skills (QEWS). Spinal Cord, 53(10), pp. 743-749.

Fonte

Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation; School of Public Health & Social Work

Tipo

Journal Article