Indigenous as ’not-Indigenous' as ’Us'?: A dissident insider's views on pushing the bounds for what constitutes 'our mob'


Autoria(s): Chalmers, Gordon
Data(s)

2013

Resumo

In australia, 'Aboriginality' is often defined by people in constrictive ways that are heavily influenced by the coloniser's epistemological frameworks. An essential component of this is a 'racial' categorisation of peoples that marks sameness and difference, thereby influencing insider and outsider status. In one sense, this categorisation of people acts to exclude non-aboriginal 'others' from participation in preinvasion indigenous ontologies, ways of living that may not have contained such restrictive identity categories and were thereby highly inclusive of outsiders. One of the effects of this is that aboriginal peoples' efforts for 'advancement' - either out of 'disadvantage' and/or towards political independence (ie, sovereignty) - become confined and restricted by what is deemed possible within the coloniser's epistemological frameworks. This is so much so that aboriginal people are at risk of only reinforcing and upholding the very systems that resulted in their original and continuing dispossession.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/91414/

Publicador

University of New South Wales - Indigenous Law Centre

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/91414/3/91414.pdf

http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=900634481905301;res=IELAPA

Chalmers, Gordon (2013) Indigenous as ’not-Indigenous' as ’Us'?: A dissident insider's views on pushing the bounds for what constitutes 'our mob'. Australian Indigenous Law Review, 17(2), pp. 47-55.

Direitos

Copyright 2013 Indigenous Law Centre, University of New South Wales

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180000 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES #180100 LAW #180101 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Law #racial categorisation #indigenous ontologies #aboriginality #Yanyuwa aboriginal people’s laws
Tipo

Journal Article