Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian approaches to STEM education
Data(s) |
12/11/2015
|
---|---|
Resumo |
STEM education faces an interesting conundrum. Western countries have implemented constructivist inspired student centred practices which are argued to be more engaging and relevant to student learning than the traditional, didactic approaches. However, student interest in pursuing careers in STEM have fallen or stagnated. In contrast, students in many developing countries in which teaching is still somewhat didactic and teacher centred are more disposed to STEM related careers than their western counterparts. Clearly, factors are at work which impact the way students value science and mathematics. This review draws on three components that act as determinants of science education in three different countries – Australia, India and Malaysia. We explore how national priorities and educational philosophy impacts educational practices as well as teacher beliefs and the need for suitable professional development. Socio-economic conditions for science education that are fundamental for developing countries in adopting constructivist educational models are analysed. It is identified that in order to reduce structural dissimilarities among countries that cause fragmentation of scientific knowledge, for Malaysia constructivist science education through English medium without losing the spirit of Malaysian culture and Malay language is essential while India need to adopt constructivist quality indicators in education. While adopting international English education, and reducing dominance of impact evaluation, India and Malaysia need to prevent losing their cultural and social capital vigour. Furthermore the paper argues that Australia might need to question the efficacy of current models that fail to engage students’ long term interest in STEM related careers. Australian and Malaysian science teachers must be capable of changing the personal biographies of learners for developing scientific conceptual information. In addition both Malaysia and Australia need to provide opportunities for access to different curricular programmes of knowledge based constructivist learning for different levels of learner competencies. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Elsevier |
Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/89486/1/Thomas_Watters-DraftforIJED.pdf DOI:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002 Thomas, Bibi & Watters, James J. (2015) Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational Development, 45, pp. 42-53. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2015 Elsevier Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution; Non-Commercial; No-Derivatives 4.0 International. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002 |
Fonte |
School of Curriculum; Faculty of Education |
Palavras-Chave | #130212 Science Technology and Engineering Curriculum and Pedagogy #130302 Comparative and Cross-Cultural Education #STEM Education #Constructivism #Indian Educational practices in Science #Malaysian Educational practices in Science #Australian Educational practices in Science |
Tipo |
Journal Article |