An agreement to negotiate a contract in good faith: No legal content and too uncertain for enforcement


Autoria(s): Duncan, William D.; Christensen, Sharon
Data(s)

01/04/2015

Resumo

The decision of Baldwin v Icon Energy Ltd [2015] QSC 12 is generally instructive upon the issue of the minimum required to enforce an agreement to negotiate .The language of these agreements is always couched in terms which include the expressions “good faith” and “reasonable endeavours” as descriptive of the yardstick of behaviour of each party in the intended negotiation to follow such an agreement. However, the mere statement of these intended characteristics of negotiation may not be sufficient to ensure that the agreement to negotiate is enforceable.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/87598/

Publicador

LexisNexis Butterworths

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/87598/3/87598.pdf

http://lexisweb.lexisnexis.com.au/JournalOverview.aspx?id=201530APLB00300034_00002

Duncan, William D. & Christensen, Sharon (2015) An agreement to negotiate a contract in good faith: No legal content and too uncertain for enforcement. Australian Property Law Bulletin, 30(3), pp. 37-39.

Direitos

Copyright 2015 LexisNexis Butterworths

Fonte

Commercial & Property Law Research Centre; Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180100 LAW #180105 Commercial and Contract Law #180124 Property Law (excl. Intellectual Property Law)
Tipo

Journal Article