Comparison of visual inspection and structural-health monitoring as bridge condition assessment methods


Autoria(s): Agdas, Duzgun; Rice, Jennifer A.; Martinez, Justin R.; Lasa, Ivan R.
Data(s)

01/06/2015

Resumo

This paper presents the results of a research project aimed at examining the capabilities and challenges of two distinct but not mutually exclusive approaches to in-service bridge assessment: visual inspection and installed monitoring systems. In this study, the intended functionality of both approaches was evaluated on its ability to identify potential structural damage and to provide decision-making support. Inspection and monitoring are compared in terms of their functional performance, cost, and barriers (real and perceived) to implementation. Both methods have strengths and weaknesses across the metrics analyzed, and it is likely that a hybrid evaluation technique that adopts both approaches will optimize efficiency of condition assessment and ultimately lead to better decision making.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/86517/

Publicador

American Society of Civil Engineers

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/86517/1/Bridge%20Inspection%20Paper_eprints%20version%20.pdf

DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000802

Agdas, Duzgun, Rice, Jennifer A., Martinez, Justin R., & Lasa, Ivan R. (2015) Comparison of visual inspection and structural-health monitoring as bridge condition assessment methods. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. (In Press)

Direitos

Copyright 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers

Fonte

School of Civil Engineering & Built Environment; Science & Engineering Faculty

Palavras-Chave #090502 Construction Engineering #090505 Infrastructure Engineering and Asset Management #090506 Structural Engineering
Tipo

Journal Article