Commentary on the article by Swanenburg et al. ‘Validity and reliability of a German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-G)’
Data(s) |
2014
|
---|---|
Resumo |
We commend Swanenburg et al. (2013) on translation, development, and clinimetric analysis of the NDI-G. However, the dual-factor structure with factor analysis and the high level of internal consistency (IC) highlighted in their discussion were not emphasized in the abstract or conclusion. These points may imply some inconsistencies with the final conclusions since determination of stable point estimates with the study's small sample are exceedingly difficult. |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Churchill Livingston |
Relação |
DOI:10.1016/j.math.2013.10.007 Gabel, Charles Philip, Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I., Osborne, Jason W., & Melloh, Markus (2014) Commentary on the article by Swanenburg et al. ‘Validity and reliability of a German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-G)’. Manual Therapy, 19(1), e1-e2. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2014 Elsevier |
Fonte |
School of Clinical Sciences; Faculty of Health |
Tipo |
Journal Article |