Monitoring does not always count


Autoria(s): McDonald-Madden, E.; Baxter, P. W. J.; Fuller, R. A.; Martin, T. G.; Game, E. T.; Montambault, J.; Possingham, H. P.
Data(s)

2010

Resumo

The gross under-resourcing of conservation endeavours has placed an increasing emphasis on spending accountability. Increased accountability has led to monitoring forming a central element of conservation programs. Although there is little doubt that information obtained from monitoring can improve management of biodiversity, the cost (in time and/or money) of gaining this knowledge is rarely considered when making decisions about allocation of resources to monitoring. We present a simple framework allowing managers and policy advisors to make decisions about when to invest in monitoring to improve management. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/82397/

Publicador

Elsevier

Relação

DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2010.07.002

McDonald-Madden, E., Baxter, P. W. J., Fuller, R. A., Martin, T. G., Game, E. T., Montambault, J., & Possingham, H. P. (2010) Monitoring does not always count. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25(10), pp. 547-550.

Direitos

Elsevier

Fonte

School of Earth, Environmental & Biological Sciences; Science & Engineering Faculty

Palavras-Chave #animal #decision tree #economics #environmental monitoring #environmental protection #killer whale #marsupial #note #songbird #Animals #Conservation of Natural Resources #Decision Trees #Marsupialia #Songbirds #Whale #Killer
Tipo

Journal Article