Monitoring does not always count
Data(s) |
2010
|
---|---|
Resumo |
The gross under-resourcing of conservation endeavours has placed an increasing emphasis on spending accountability. Increased accountability has led to monitoring forming a central element of conservation programs. Although there is little doubt that information obtained from monitoring can improve management of biodiversity, the cost (in time and/or money) of gaining this knowledge is rarely considered when making decisions about allocation of resources to monitoring. We present a simple framework allowing managers and policy advisors to make decisions about when to invest in monitoring to improve management. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Elsevier |
Relação |
DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2010.07.002 McDonald-Madden, E., Baxter, P. W. J., Fuller, R. A., Martin, T. G., Game, E. T., Montambault, J., & Possingham, H. P. (2010) Monitoring does not always count. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25(10), pp. 547-550. |
Direitos |
Elsevier |
Fonte |
School of Earth, Environmental & Biological Sciences; Science & Engineering Faculty |
Palavras-Chave | #animal #decision tree #economics #environmental monitoring #environmental protection #killer whale #marsupial #note #songbird #Animals #Conservation of Natural Resources #Decision Trees #Marsupialia #Songbirds #Whale #Killer |
Tipo |
Journal Article |