Stigmatization of failed entrepreneurs : prevalence and solutions


Autoria(s): Jenkins, Anna; Hellerstedt, Karin; Hunter, Erik; Davidsson, Per
Data(s)

2014

Resumo

This paper investigates why entrepreneurs experience stigma after firm failure and what can be done to reduce it. We use attribution theory as an overarching theoretical framework and hypothesize that entrepreneurs are held more accountable than employees for their unemployment after firm failure irrespective of the circumstances causing the failure. To test this hypothesis we conduct a between group, 2x2 full factorial experiment where the cause of the failure is manipulated. We find that entrepreneurs are held more accountable for firm failure irrespective of the circumstances causing the failure and that respondents who view failure as an inherent risk of firm ownership are less likely to stigmatize failed entrepreneurs.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/80105/

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/80105/6/80105.pdf

http://www.babson.edu/Academics/centers/blank-center/bcerc/Pages/home.aspx

Jenkins, Anna, Hellerstedt, Karin, Hunter, Erik, & Davidsson, Per (2014) Stigmatization of failed entrepreneurs : prevalence and solutions. In 2014 Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, 4 – 7 June 2014, Ontario, Canada.

Direitos

Copyright 2014 [please consult the author]

Fonte

Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship; QUT Business School; School of Management

Palavras-Chave #150304 Entrepreneurship #Failed Entrepreneurs #Entrepreneurship #Firm Failure
Tipo

Conference Paper