A systematic review of prescribing criteria to evaluate appropriateness of medications in frail older people


Autoria(s): Poudel, A; Peel, NM; Mitchell, C; Nissen, LM; Hubbard, RE
Data(s)

01/11/2014

Resumo

This study systematically reviews the published literature regarding inappropriate prescribing in frail individuals aged at least 65 years. Twenty-five of 466 identified studies met the inclusion criteria. All papers measured some surrogate indicators of frailty, such as performance-based tests, cognitive function and functional dependency. Beers criteria were used in 20 studies (74%) to evaluate inappropriate medication use and 36% (9/25) studies used more than one criterion. The prevalence of inappropriate medications ranged widely from 11 to 92%. Only a few studies reported the relationship between potentially inappropriate medication use and surrogate measures of frailty. These diverse findings indicate the need for a standardized measure for assessing appropriateness of medication in frail older individuals. Prescribing tools should address both medication and patient-related factors such as life expectancy and functional status to minimize inappropriate prescribing in frail individuals.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/79568/

Publicador

Cambridge University Press

Relação

DOI:10.1017/S0959259814000161

Poudel, A, Peel, NM, Mitchell, C, Nissen, LM, & Hubbard, RE (2014) A systematic review of prescribing criteria to evaluate appropriateness of medications in frail older people. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 24(4), pp. 304-318.

Direitos

Copyright 2014 Cambridge University Press

Fonte

School of Clinical Sciences; Faculty of Health

Palavras-Chave #111502 Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics #frailty #inappropriate prescribing #older people #prescribing criteria #prevalence
Tipo

Journal Article