Board monitoring and the balanced scorecard in nonprofits : challenges in realising potential


Autoria(s): Hough, Alan D.; McGregor-Lowndes, Myles; Ryan, Christine M.
Contribuinte(s)

Hoque, Zahirul

Parker, Lee

Data(s)

2015

Resumo

Directors of nonprofits in most countries have legal responsibility for monitoring organisational performance (Brody 2010), although there is typically little guidance on how this should occur. The balanced scorecard (BSC) (Kaplan & Norton, 1996, 2001) potentially provides boards with a monitoring tool (Kaplan $ Norton, 2006; Lorsch, 2002). The BSC is intended to help integrate performance measurement, performance management and strategy implmentation (Kaplan 2009). The scorecards is balanced in that it should incorporate both financial and non-financial measures, external and internal perspectives, short and long-term objectives and both lagging and leading indicators. It is a relatively simple tool, but with potentially profound implications for directing board attention and sbusequent action (Ocasio, 1997; Salterio, 2012).

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/79430/

Publicador

Routledge Taylor & Francis

Relação

Hough, Alan D., McGregor-Lowndes, Myles, & Ryan, Christine M. (2015) Board monitoring and the balanced scorecard in nonprofits : challenges in realising potential. In Hoque, Zahirul & Parker, Lee (Eds.) Performance Management in Nonprofit Organizations Global : Perspectives. Routledge Taylor & Francis, New York, United States of America, pp. 337-368.

Direitos

Copyright 2015 Routledge

Fonte

Australian Centre for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Studies; QUT Business School; School of Accountancy

Palavras-Chave #150000 COMMERCE MANAGEMENT TOURISM AND SERVICES #150100 ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND ACCOUNTABILITY #Nonprofits Board monitoring #Balance scorecard in Nonprofits
Tipo

Book Chapter