Modes of criminal justice, indigenous youth and social democracy


Autoria(s): Hearfield, Colin; Scott, John
Data(s)

2012

Resumo

The political question of how the will of a community is to be democratically formed and adhered to, the question of social democracy, is normatively tied to the mode of criminal justice employed within that democratic public sphere. Liberal, republican, procedural and communitarian forms of democratic will-formation respectively reflect retributive,restorative, procedural and co-operative modes of criminal justice. After first elaborating these links through the critical response of republican and procedural theories of democracy to the liberal practice of democratic will-formation and its retributive mode of justice, our discussion considers the recent practice of restorative and procedural justice with respect to Indigenous youth; and this in the context of a severely diminished role for Indigenous justice agencies in the public sphere. In light of certain shortcomings in both the restorative and procedural modes of justice, and so too with republican and procedural understandings of the democratic public sphere, we turn to a discussion of procedural communitarianism, anchored as it is in Dewey’s notion of social co-operation. From here we attempt a brief formulation of what a socially co-operative mode of justice might consist of; a mode of justice where historically racial and economically coercive injustices are sufficiently recognised.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/79072/

Publicador

Queensland University of Technology

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/79072/1/Scott_Hearfield.pdf

http://crimejusticeconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Conference-Proceedings-2nd-ed.-2012.pdf

Hearfield, Colin & Scott, John (2012) Modes of criminal justice, indigenous youth and social democracy. In Crime, Justice and Social Democracy: An International Conference Proceedings, 2nd edition, Queensland University of Technology, QLD, pp. 59-72.

Direitos

Copyright 2011 The Authors

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Justice

Tipo

Conference Paper