Comparing the effectiveness of education and technology in reducing wood smoke pollution: A field experiment


Autoria(s): Hine, Donald W; Bhullar, Navjot; Marks, Anthony DG; Kelly, Patricia; Scott, John
Data(s)

01/12/2011

Resumo

This study describes a field experiment assessing the effectiveness of education and technological innovation in reducing air pollution generated by domestic wood heaters. Two-hundred and twenty four households from a small regional center in Australia were randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions: (1) Education only – households received a wood smoke reduction education pack containing information about the negative health impacts of wood smoke pollution, and advice about wood heater operation and firewood management; (2) SmartBurn only – households received a SmartBurn canister designed to improve combustion and help wood fires burn more efficiently, (3) Education and SmartBurn, and (4) neither Education nor SmartBurn (control). Analysis of covariance, controlling for pre-intervention household wood smoke emissions, wood moisture content, and wood heater age, revealed that education and SmartBurn were both associated with significant reduction in wood smoke emissions during the post-intervention period. Follow-up mediation analyses indicated that education reduced emissions by improving wood heater operation practices, but not by increasing health risk perceptions. As predicted, SmartBurn exerted a direct effect on emission levels, unmediated by wood heater operation practices or health risk perceptions.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/79028/

Publicador

Academic Press

Relação

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494411000375

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.05.003

Hine, Donald W, Bhullar, Navjot, Marks, Anthony DG, Kelly, Patricia, & Scott, John (2011) Comparing the effectiveness of education and technology in reducing wood smoke pollution: A field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4), pp. 282-288.

Direitos

Copyright 2011 Academic Press

Fonte

Faculty of Law; Australian Centre for Health Law Research; School of Psychology & Counselling

Tipo

Journal Article