Hamcor Pty Ltd v Queensland
Data(s) |
2014
|
---|---|
Resumo |
The Ipp Report recommendation that for claims for personal injury and death arising from the negligent performance or non-performance of a public function based upon a policy decision, could not establish negligence unless the public authority was so unreasonable that no reasonable public authority in the same position would have made it, was adopted in different ways by all jurisdictions except South Australia and the Northern Territory.1 This introduced the public law concept of Wednesbury unreasonableness to civil liability which caused much academic debate.2 Section 36 of the Queensland provides... |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Lexis Nexis Australia |
Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/78567/1/Hamcor_Pty_Ltd_v_Queensland.pdf http://www.lexisnexis.com.au/en-au/products/australian-civil-liability.page Stickley, Amanda P. (2014) Hamcor Pty Ltd v Queensland. Australian Civil Liability, 11(10), pp. 128-130. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2014 Lexis Nexis Australia |
Fonte |
Commercial & Property Law Research Centre; Faculty of Law; School of Law |
Palavras-Chave | #180126 Tort Law #Negligence #Public Authority #Civil Liability Act 2002 (Qld) s 36 |
Tipo |
Journal Article |