Exploring Australian intensive care physicians clinical judgement during donation after cardiac death : an exploratory qualitative study


Autoria(s): Coleman, Nicole L.; Bonner, Ann
Data(s)

23/11/2014

Resumo

BACKGROUND: Donation after Cardiac Death (DCD) is one possible solution to the world wide organ shortage. Intensive care physicians are central to DCD becoming successful since they are responsible for making the clinical judgements and decisions associated with DCD. Yet international evidence shows health care professionals have not embraced DCD and are often reluctant to consider it as an option for patients. PURPOSE: To explore intensive care physicians' clinical judgements when selecting a suitable DCD candidate. METHODS: Using interpretative exploratory methods six intensive care physicians were interviewed from three hospital sites in Australia. Following verbatim transcription, data was subjected to thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Three distinct themes emerged. Reducing harm and increasing benefit was a major focus of intensive care physicians during determination of DCD. There was an acceptance of DCD if there was clear evidence that donation was what the patient and family wanted. Characteristics of a defensible decision reflected the characteristics of sequencing, separation and isolation, timing, consensus and collaboration, trust and communication to ensure that judgements were robust and defensible. The final theme revealed the importance of minimising uncertainty and discomfort when predicting length of survival following withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. CONCLUSION: DCD decisions are made within an environment of uncertainty due to the imprecision associated with predicting time of death. Lack of certainty contributed to the cautious and collaborative strategies used by intensive care physicians when dealing with patients, family members and colleagues around end-of-life decisions, initiation of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and the discussion about DCD. This study recommends that nationally consistent policies are urgently needed to increase the degree of certainty for intensive care staff concerning the DCD processes.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/77737/

Publicador

Elsevier Inc.

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/77737/1/77737.pdf

DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2014.04.007

Coleman, Nicole L. & Bonner, Ann (2014) Exploring Australian intensive care physicians clinical judgement during donation after cardiac death : an exploratory qualitative study. Australian Critical Care, 27(4), pp. 172-176.

Direitos

Copyright 2014 Elsevier

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Australian Critical Care. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Australian Critical Care, [VOL 27, ISSUE 4, (2014)] DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2014.04.007

Fonte

Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation; School of Nursing

Palavras-Chave #111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified #Care & Decision #Donation after Cardiac Death #End-of-life care & decision making #Transplantation
Tipo

Journal Article