China's "Responsible Protection" concept : re-interpreting the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and military intervention for humanitarian purposes


Autoria(s): Garwood-Gowers, Andrew
Data(s)

01/01/2016

Resumo

This article assesses the extent to which the recently formulated Chinese concept of “Responsible Protection” (RP) offers a valuable contribution to the normative debate over R2P’s third pillar following the controversy over military intervention in Libya. While RP draws heavily on previous proposals such as the original 2001 ICISS report and Brazil’s “Responsibility while Protecting” (RwP), by amalgamating and re-packaging these earlier ideas in a more restrictive form the initiative represents a new and distinctive interpretation of R2P. However, some aspects of RP are framed too narrowly to provide workable guidelines for determining the permissibility of military intervention for civilian protection purposes, and should therefore be clarified and refined. Nevertheless, the Chinese proposal remains significant because it offers important insights into Beijing’s current stance on R2P. More broadly, China’s RP and Brazil’s RwP initiatives illustrate the growing willingness of rising, non-Western powers to assert their own normative preferences on sovereignty, intervention and global governance.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/75548/

Publicador

Cambridge University Press

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/75548/1/75548.pdf

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=AJL

DOI:10.1017/S2044251314000368

Garwood-Gowers, Andrew (2016) China's "Responsible Protection" concept : re-interpreting the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and military intervention for humanitarian purposes. Asian Journal of International Law, 6(1), pp. 89-118.

Direitos

Copyright 2014 Cambridge University Press

This article has been accepted for publication and will appear in a revised form, subsequent to peer review and/or editorial input by Cambridge University Press, in Asian Journal of International Law, published by Cambridge University Press.

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #160607 International Relations #180116 International Law (excl. International Trade Law) #responsibility to protect #use of force #humanitarian intervention #China #"Responsible Protection"
Tipo

Journal Article