Should the court direct that costs ordered to be recovered on the indemnity basis be assessed by reference to a costs agreement between the successful party and their solicitors?
Data(s) |
01/11/2006
|
---|---|
Resumo |
The decision in Hook v Boreham & QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited [2006] QDC 304 considered whether the court should go further than order that costs be assessed on the indemnity basis, but should also specify the basis by which those indemnity costs should be determined. The decision makes it clear that under r704(3) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, questions of that nature are ordinarily preserved to the discretion of the Registrar. |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Queensland Law Society Inc. |
Relação |
http://www.qls.com.au/About_QLS/Queensland_Law_Society/Resources_publications/Newsletters_magazines/Proctor Jackson, Sheryl (2006) Should the court direct that costs ordered to be recovered on the indemnity basis be assessed by reference to a costs agreement between the successful party and their solicitors? Proctor, 26(10), pp. 42-43. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2006 The author |
Fonte |
Faculty of Law; School of Law |
Palavras-Chave | #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #costs ordered on indemnity basis #whether court should, or could, make orders about basis of assessment |
Tipo |
Journal Article |