Costs order against company in liquidation unlikely to be effective indemnity


Autoria(s): Jackson, Sheryl
Data(s)

01/12/2003

Resumo

In Kimtran v Downie [2003] QCA 424, the Queensland Court of Appeal allowed an appeal from the decision of a District Court judge who had ordered costs against a non-party liquidator. It held that the court's decision in relation to the awarding of costs against a liquidator was not constrained by the decision of the of the Court of Appeal in Mahaffey v Belar Pty Ltd [1999] QCA 2 in the manner stated in the District Court.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/73065/

Publicador

Queensland Law Society Inc

Relação

http://www.qls.com.au/About_QLS/Queensland_Law_Society/Resources_publications/Newsletters_magazines/Proctor

Jackson, Sheryl (2003) Costs order against company in liquidation unlikely to be effective indemnity. Proctor, 23(11), p. 34.

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #costs ordered against company in liquidation #power of Commercial and Consumer Tribunal to award costs against non-party #propriety of liquidator's conduct not in question #no costs ordered against liquidator
Tipo

Journal Article