Combining expert opinions in prior elicitation
Data(s) |
2012
|
---|---|
Resumo |
We consider the problem of combining opinions from different experts in an explicitly model-based way to construct a valid subjective prior in a Bayesian statistical approach. We propose a generic approach by considering a hierarchical model accounting for various sources of variation as well as accounting for potential dependence between experts. We apply this approach to two problems. The first problem deals with a food risk assessment problem involving modelling dose-response for Listeria monocytogenes contamination of mice. Two hierarchical levels of variation are considered (between and within experts) with a complex mathematical situation due to the use of an indirect probit regression. The second concerns the time taken by PhD students to submit their thesis in a particular school. It illustrates a complex situation where three hierarchical levels of variation are modelled but with a simpler underlying probability distribution (log-Normal). |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
International Society for Bayesian Analysis |
Relação |
http://ba.stat.cmu.edu/journal/2012/vol07/issue03/albert.pdf DOI:10.1214/12-BA717 Albert, Isabelle, Donnet, Sophie, Guihenneuc-Jouyaux, Chantal, Low-Choy, Samantha, Mengersen, Kerrie, & Rousseau, Judith (2012) Combining expert opinions in prior elicitation. Bayesian Analysis, 7(3), pp. 503-532. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2012 International Society for Bayesian Analysis |
Fonte |
School of Mathematical Sciences; Science & Engineering Faculty |
Palavras-Chave | #010401 Applied Statistics #010405 Statistical Theory #Bayesian statistics #Hierarchical model #Random effects #Risk assessment |
Tipo |
Journal Article |