Why assessing relevance in medical IR is demanding


Autoria(s): Koopman, Bevan; Zuccon, Guido
Data(s)

01/07/2014

Resumo

This study investigates if and why assessing relevance of clinical records for a clinical retrieval task is cognitively demanding. Previous research has highlighted the challenges and issues information retrieval systems are faced with when determining the relevance of documents in this domain, e.g., the vocabulary mismatch problem. Determining if this assessment imposes cognitive load on human assessors, and why this is the case, may shed lights on what are the (cognitive) processes that assessors use for determining document relevance (in this domain). High cognitive load may impair the ability of the user to make accurate relevance judgements and hence the design of IR mechanisms may need to take this into account in order to reduce the load.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/72853/

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/72853/1/medIR2014-relevance_assessment.pdf

Koopman, Bevan & Zuccon, Guido (2014) Why assessing relevance in medical IR is demanding. In Medical Information Retrieval (MedIR) Workshop, 11 July 2014, Gold Coast, QLD. (In Press)

Direitos

Copyright 2014 The Author(s)

Fonte

School of Information Systems; Science & Engineering Faculty

Palavras-Chave #080702 Health Informatics #080704 Information Retrieval and Web Search #relevance assessment #information retrieval #health informatics #health search #demand
Tipo

Conference Paper