Costs - solicitor's retainer on 'no win, no fee' basis - meaning of 'win' - solicitor not entitled to recover excess of costs over amount paid on settlement - no consideration for variation of oral retainer.
Data(s) |
01/09/2002
|
---|---|
Resumo |
In Baker Johnson Lawyers v Jorgensen [2002] QDC 205 McGill DCJ considered the meaning of a 'no win, no fee' retainer and concluded that, in the absence of qualification by agreement, solicitors retained on that basis were not entitled to recover costs exceeding the amount of any judgment or settlement. |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Queensland Law Society Inc. |
Relação |
http://www.qls.com.au/About_QLS/Queensland_Law_Society/Resources_publications/Newsletters_magazines/Proctor Jackson, Sheryl (2002) Costs - solicitor's retainer on 'no win, no fee' basis - meaning of 'win' - solicitor not entitled to recover excess of costs over amount paid on settlement - no consideration for variation of oral retainer. Proctor, 22(8), p. 29. |
Fonte |
Faculty of Law; School of Law |
Palavras-Chave | #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #solicitor's retainer on 'no win no fee' basis #meaning of 'win' #whether entitlement to recover excess of costs over settlement amount |
Tipo |
Journal Article |