Why we should not cut P.E.


Autoria(s): Trost, Stewart G.; van der Mars, Hans
Data(s)

2009

Resumo

Thinking of cutting physical education? Think again. Even as we bemoan children's sedentary lifestyles, we often sacrifice school-based physical education in the name of providing more time for academics. In 2006, only 3.8 percent of elementary schools, 7.9 percent of middle schools, and 2.1 percent of high schools offered students daily physical education or its equivalent for the entire school year (Lee, Burgeson, Fulton, & Spain, 2007). We believe this marked reduction in school-based physical activity risks students' health and can't be justified on educational or ethical grounds. We'll get to the educational grounds in a moment. As to ethical reasons for keeping physical activity part of our young people's school days, consider the fact that childhood obesity is now one of the most serious health issues facing U.S. children (Ogden et al., 2006). School-based physical education programs engage students in regular physical activity and help them acquire skills and habits necessary to pursue an active lifestyle. Such programs are directly relevant to preventing obesity. Yet they are increasingly on the chopping block.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/72258/

Publicador

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/72258/1/72258%28pub%29.pdf

http://www.sparkpe.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Why-We-Should-Not-Cut-PE.pdf

Trost, Stewart G. & van der Mars, Hans (2009) Why we should not cut P.E. Educational Leadership, 67(4), pp. 60-65.

Direitos

Copyright 2009 Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Fonte

Faculty of Health

Tipo

Journal Article