Reason is too large : analogy and precedent in law
| Data(s) |
2001
|
|---|---|
| Resumo |
Hunter argues that cognitive science models of human thinking explain how analogical reasoning and precedential reasoning operate in law. He offers an explanation of why various legal theories are so limited and calls for greater attention to what is actually happening when lawyers and judges reason, by analogy, with precedent. |
| Identificador | |
| Publicador |
Emory University * School of Law |
| Relação |
http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/emlj50&div=41&g_sent=1&collection=journals#9 Hunter, Dan (2001) Reason is too large : analogy and precedent in law. Emory Law Journal, 50(4), pp. 1197-1264. |
| Fonte |
Faculty of Law; School of Law |
| Tipo |
Journal Article |
