What further benefit, if any, might Australia get from the ALI-III Transnational Insolvency: Global Principles for Cooperation in International Insolvency Cases?


Autoria(s): Mason, Rosalind F.; Jackson, Sheryl; Wellard, Mark Norman
Data(s)

2014

Resumo

In 2006, the American Law Institute (ALI) and the International Insolvency Institute (III) established a Transnational Insolvency Project and appointed Professor Ian Fletcher (United Kingdom) and Professor Bob Wessels (Netherlands) as Joint Reporters. The objective was to investigate whether the essential provisions of the ALI Principles of Cooperation among the NAFTA Countries (ALI-NAFTA Principles) and the annexed Guidelines Applicable to Court-to-Court Communication in Cross-border Cases (ALI-NAFTA Guidelines) may, with certain necessary modifications, be acceptable for use by jurisdictions across the world. In 2012, Professor Fletcher and Professor Wessels presented the report Transnational Insolvency: Global Principles for Cooperation in International Insolvency Cases (“ALI-III Report”) to the Annual Meetings of the American Law Institute and the International Insolvency Institute. In 2013, the Australian Academy of Law (AAL) provided support to the authors to undertake research on the possible benefits for Australia of courts and insolvency administrators of referring to the ALI-III Report when addressing international insolvency cases. This AAL project was at the request of the Council of Chief Justices of Australia and New Zealand. This research Report compares the Global Principles for Cooperation in International Insolvency Cases with the Cross-border Insolvency Act 2008 and the UNCITRAL Model Law as it has been adopted and has force of law in Australia. Further, it examines the Global Guidelines for Court-to-Court Communications in International Insolvency Cases in light of Australian cross-border insolvency and procedural law. Finally, it makes brief reference to and commentary on the Global Rules on Conflict–of-Laws Matters in International Insolvency Cases annexed to the ALI-III Report from the perspective of Australian choice of law rules.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/69628/

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/69628/4/AAL%20Combined.pdf

Mason, Rosalind F., Jackson, Sheryl, & Wellard, Mark Norman (2014) What further benefit, if any, might Australia get from the ALI-III Transnational Insolvency: Global Principles for Cooperation in International Insolvency Cases?

Direitos

Copyright 2014 [please consult the authors]

Fonte

Commercial & Property Law Research Centre; Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180107 Conflict of Laws (Private International Law) #180116 International Law (excl. International Trade Law) #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #International Insolvency #Cross-border Insolvency #Civil Litigation #Case Management #court-to-court communication #Choice of Law #international business law #insolvency and restructuring
Tipo

Report