Ethnography considered useful : situating criticality


Autoria(s): Morrison, Ann; Viller, Stephen; Mitchell, Peta
Data(s)

2010

Resumo

Increasingly the fields of Human Computer Interaction (HCI) and art are intersecting. Interactive artworks are being evaluated by HCI methods and artworks are being created that employ and repurpose technology for interactive environments. In this paper we steer a path between empirical and critical–theoretical traditions, and discuss HCI research and art works that also span this divide. We address concerns about ‘new’ ethnography raised by Crabtree et al. (2009) in “Ethnography Considered Harmful”, a critical essay that positions ethnographic and critical-theoretical views at odds with each other. We propose a mediated view for understanding interactions within open-ended interactive artworks that values both perspectives as we navigate boundaries between art practice and HCI.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/69226/

Publicador

ACM

Relação

http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1952222.1952261

DOI:10.1145/1952222.1952261

Morrison, Ann, Viller, Stephen, & Mitchell, Peta (2010) Ethnography considered useful : situating criticality. In OZCHI '10 Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction, ACM, 22-26 November 2010, pp. 184-187.

Direitos

Copyright 2010 the author(s) and CHISIG

Fonte

Creative Industries Faculty; School of Media, Entertainment & Creative Arts

Palavras-Chave #080602 Computer-Human Interaction #190504 Performance and Installation Art #Ethnomethodology #Situated action #Interactive art #Interaction design
Tipo

Conference Paper