The environmental enigma : why do producers professing stewardship continue to practice poor natural resource management?


Autoria(s): Lawrence, Geoffrey; Richards, Carol A.; Cheshire, Lynda
Data(s)

2004

Resumo

Despite a wide acceptance that primary producers in Australia subscribe to a stewardship ethic, land and water degradation remains an ongoing problem. Recent calculations suggest that the economic cost of Australia's environmental degradation is amounting to more than $A3.5 billion a year with an estimated cost of managing (not overcoming) problems of salinity, acidification, soil erosion totalling $A60 billion over the next decade. This paper argues that stewardship itself is an unsatisfactory concept when looking to landholders to respond to environmental problems, for rarely does the attitude of stewardship translate into behaviours of improving natural resource management practices on private land. Whilst there is some acceptance of the environmental problem among primary producers, a number of external constraints may also impede the uptake of conservation-orientated practices. In light of the prevailing accounts of poor adoption of sustainable practices a number of policy options are reviewed in this paper, including formal regional partnerships, regulatory frameworks and market-based measures. It is concluded that the contentious nature of some of these new opportunities for change will mean that any moves aimed at reversing environmental degradation in Australia will be slow.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/68198/

Publicador

Routledge

Relação

DOI:10.1080/1523908042000344069

Lawrence, Geoffrey, Richards, Carol A., & Cheshire, Lynda (2004) The environmental enigma : why do producers professing stewardship continue to practice poor natural resource management? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 6(3/4), pp. 251-270.

Fonte

QUT Business School; School of Management

Palavras-Chave #Environmental policy, sustainable natural resource management,
Tipo

Journal Article