Repeatability of confocal microscopy measurements on the central and peripheral cornea

Purpose To assess confocal microscopy repeatability (ConfoScan3, Nidek, Italy) when assessing the morphology of the limbus, midperipheral and central cornea. Method The central, mid-peripheral and limbal cornea (temporal and nasal) of the right eye of 8 subjects were examined with a ConfoScan3 in two different visits, at least six months apart. Bland-Altman repeatability was measured for 29 parameters: basal cell density and size, anterior and posterior keratocyte densities (AKD/PKD), endothelial cell density, polymegethism, pleomorphism, mean area and sides of endothelial cells - in the five different corneal areas examined. Results As a percentage of the mean absolute values, repeatability of 0–10% was classified as “excellent”, between 10–30% as “acceptable” and over 30% as “poor”. Repeatability was excellent for 14% of parameters and acceptable for 52% of parameters. The number of endothelial cell sides in the central cornea demonstrated the best repeatability (2.0%) whilst mid-temporal PKD showed the poorest repeatability (53.7%). Conclusions Confocal microscopy is at least an adequately repeatablemethodof evaluating the various corneal layers at different locations. Our dataset supports the ongoing use of the technique in research and clinical practice.