Acting to let someone die


Autoria(s): McGee, Andrew
Data(s)

10/02/2015

Resumo

This paper examines the recent prominent view in medical ethics that withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (LST) is an act of killing. I trace this view to the rejection of the traditional claim that withdrawing LST is an omission rather than an act. Although that traditional claim is not as problematic as this recent prominent view suggests, my main claim is that even if we accepted that withdrawing LST should be classified as an act rather than as an omission, it could still be classified as letting die rather than killing. Even though omissions are contrasted with acts, letting die need not be, for one can let die by means of acts. The remainder of the paper is devoted to establishing this claim and addresses certain objections to it.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/66722/

Publicador

Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/66722/2/66722.pdf

DOI:10.1111/bioe.12072

McGee, Andrew (2015) Acting to let someone die. Bioethics, 29(2), pp. 74-81.

Direitos

Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com

Fonte

Faculty of Law; Australian Centre for Health Law Research; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180000 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES #220000 PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES #220100 APPLIED ETHICS #Acts #Killing #Letting Die #Omissions #Causing Death #Interloper #Withdrawing Life-Support
Tipo

Journal Article