A clear view of costs ‘of and incidental to’ : Mio Art Pty Ltd v Macequest (No.2) Pty Ltd [2013] QSC 271
| Data(s) |
01/12/2013
|
|---|---|
| Resumo |
In Mio Art Pty Ltd v Macequest (No.2) Pty Ltd [2013] QSC 271 Jackson J provided considered analysis of several aspects of costs law. His Honour regarded various orders which are commonly sought or made as reflecting practice that is inappropriate or unnecessary under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) (UCPR). |
| Formato |
application/pdf |
| Identificador | |
| Publicador |
Queensland Law Society Inc. |
| Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/66184/2/66184.pdf Jackson, Sheryl (2013) A clear view of costs ‘of and incidental to’ : Mio Art Pty Ltd v Macequest (No.2) Pty Ltd [2013] QSC 271. Proctor, 33(11), pp. 46-47. |
| Direitos |
Copyright 2013 The Author |
| Fonte |
Faculty of Law; School of Law |
| Palavras-Chave | #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #costs orders #costs "of and incidental to" #indemnity costs #reserved costs |
| Tipo |
Journal Article |
