Academia Accommodating Plagiarism? Surely Not!


Autoria(s): Luke, Belinda G.; Kearins, Kate
Contribuinte(s)

Diochon, Pauline Fatien

Raufflet, Emmanuel

Mills, Albert J.

Data(s)

01/08/2013

Resumo

In April 2010, Senior lecturer A discovered a new article on strategic entrepreneurship that contained her own words and paragraphs, published under the name of two complete strangers. Over the next eight months, in search of a just outcome, A contacted various people and institutions involved: the journal editor and publisher, and more than 20 academics and academic managers at five universities located in four different countries, including vice chancellors, rectors, and university professors. While nobody disputed the plagiarism (which involved at least three documents and more than 50 pages of text, tables, and figures), most were reluctant to act. Disillusioned by institutional responses, A had to decide whether to continue pursuing a just outcome at the risk of damaging professional relationships (and her future career), or whether to accept the status quo. She wondered what it would take to change the system to genuinely reject plagiarism.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/65039/

Publicador

Greenleaf Publishing

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/65039/2/65039.pdf

http://www.greenleaf-publishing.com/productdetail.kmod?productid=3853

Luke, Belinda G. & Kearins, Kate (2013) Academia Accommodating Plagiarism? Surely Not! In Diochon, Pauline Fatien, Raufflet, Emmanuel, & Mills, Albert J. (Eds.) The Dark Side 2 : Critical Cases on the Downside of Business. Greenleaf Publishing, United Kingdom, pp. 167-186.

Direitos

Copyright 2013 Greenleaf Publishing Limited

Fonte

QUT Business School; School of Accountancy

Palavras-Chave #150000 COMMERCE MANAGEMENT TOURISM AND SERVICES #plagiarism #academic plagiarism #institutional response to plagiarism
Tipo

Book Chapter