Parties legally bound to unsigned put and call option


Autoria(s): Backstrom, Michelle
Data(s)

2009

Resumo

The point at which the parties to a negotiation for the sale of land are legally bound can often be difficult to judge. This is particularly so where the parties have agreed a lawyer is to formalise the agreement between them. When the parties have not agreed all matters relating to the transaction, interesting questions arise as to what terms regulate the relationship. In Moffatt Property Development Group Pty Ltd v Hebron Park Pty Ltd [2009] QCA 60 the Queensland Court of Appeal considered first, whether there was a binding agreement to sell and secondly, how the relationship would be regulated in the absence of express agreement in relation to many of the terms.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/64116/

Publicador

Lexis Nexis Butterworths

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/64116/2/64116.pdf

http://www.lexisnexis.com.au/en-AU/Products/australian-property-law-bulletin.page

Backstrom, Michelle (2009) Parties legally bound to unsigned put and call option. Australian Property Law Bulletin, 24(1), pp. 8-11.

Direitos

Copyright 2009 Lexis Nexis Butterworths

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180000 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES #180100 LAW #contractual intention #put and call option #Hebron Park #Masters v Cameron #Property Law Act (Qld) 1974 s59
Tipo

Journal Article