Why ADR must be a mandatory subject in the law degree - the profession


Autoria(s): Duffy, James; Field, Rachael M.
Data(s)

01/09/2013

Resumo

The Australian legal profession, as well as the content and pedagogy of legal education across Australia, are steeped in tradition and conservatism. Indeed, the legal profession and our institutions of legal education are in a relationship of mutual influence which leaves the way we teach law resistant to change. There has traditionally been pushback against the notion that dispute resolution should have a place amongst black letter law subjects in the legal curriculum. This paper argues that this position cannot be maintained in the modern legal climate. We challenge legal education orthodoxy and promote NADRAC’s position that alternative dispute resolution should be a compulsory, stand alone subject in the law degree. We put forward ten simple arguments as to why every law student should be exposed to a semester long course of DR instruction.

Formato

application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/63101/

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/63101/1/LEADR_2013_-_Duffy_and_Field.pptx

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/63101/2/LEADR_abstract.pdf

http://www.leadr.com.au/kon-gres/presenters-and-their-presentations/why-adr-must-be-a-mandatory-subject-in-the-law-degree

Duffy, James & Field, Rachael M. (2013) Why ADR must be a mandatory subject in the law degree - the profession. In Kon gres 2013, 9-10 September 2013, Sydney, NSW.

Direitos

Copyright 2013 [please consult the author]

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180100 LAW #Alternative dispute resolution #compulsory #mediation #legal education #mandatory
Tipo

Conference Item