Open for Inspection? Julstar Pty Ltd v Lynch Morgan Lawyers [2012] QDC 272


Autoria(s): Jackson, Sheryl; Garrett, Paul
Data(s)

01/11/2012

Resumo

In Julstar Pty Ltd v Lynch Morgan Lawyers [2012] QDC 272 Dorney QC DCJ considered whether an applicant for an assessment of all or part of their costs under s 335 of the Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld) (LPA) must provide grounds on which they dispute the amount of the costs charged or their liability to pay them. His Honour also made an order for inspection of the solicitor’s file, despite a claimed lien for unpaid fees.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/63045/

Publicador

Queensland Law Society Inc.

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/63045/2/63045.pdf

http://www.qls.com.au/About_QLS/Queensland_Law_Society/Resources_publications/Newsletters_magazines/Proctor

Jackson, Sheryl & Garrett, Paul (2012) Open for Inspection? Julstar Pty Ltd v Lynch Morgan Lawyers [2012] QDC 272. Proctor, 32(10), pp. 36-37.

Direitos

Copyright 2012 the authors.

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180121 Legal Practice Lawyering and the Legal Profession #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #UCPR r743A #assessment of costs #inspection of solicitor's file when lien claimed #UCPR r223 #relevance of discretionary factors #scope of discretion
Tipo

Journal Article