Pleading intention
Data(s) |
01/03/2013
|
---|---|
Resumo |
This article considers the scope of the application of the civil liability legislation, an issue which is still being clarified by the courts, despite the passage of some ten years since the enactment of the non-uniform civil liability legislation across Australia. The introduction of the civil liability legislation has made more important the pleading of intention, in addition to negligence, so as to maximise damages awards. This involves pleading torts traditionally referred to as intentional torts – particularly trespass to the person. Such an approach is attractive for plaintiffs because, in several jurisdictions, tort claims which plead intention have been excluded from the operation of the legislative restrictions on the quantum of damages awards, and prohibitions on exemplary and aggravated damages. This approach reflects the policy that those who intend the harmful consequences of their actions should be held fully responsible. |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Australian Lawyers Alliance |
Relação |
Cockburn, Tina & Madden, Bill (2013) Pleading intention. Precedent, pp. 42-46. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2013 Precedent and the authors |
Fonte |
Faculty of Law; Australian Centre for Health Law Research; School of Law |
Palavras-Chave | #180126 Tort Law #intentional tort #medical law #damages #consent #civil liability |
Tipo |
Journal Article |