PI claim clears the statute bar
| Data(s) |
01/04/2013
|
|---|---|
| Resumo |
In Hughes v Impulse Entertainment Pty Ltd & Workcover Queensland [2013] QDC 21 the plaintiff commenced a proceeding more than 60 days after the compulsory conference under the Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld). The question to be determined was whether this meant the claim was statute-barred under that Act, even though the relevant limitation period under the Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld) had not expired |
| Formato |
application/pdf |
| Identificador | |
| Publicador |
Queensland Law Society Inc. |
| Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/60947/2/60947.pdf http://www.qls.com.au/About_QLS/Queensland_Law_Society/Resources_publications/Newsletters_magazines/Proctor Jackson, Sheryl (2013) PI claim clears the statute bar. Proctor, 33(3), pp. 46-47. |
| Direitos |
Copyright 2013 Please consult author |
| Fonte |
Faculty of Law; School of Law |
| Palavras-Chave | #180100 LAW #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #personal injury claim against employer #compulsory conference #limitation of actions #notices of claim #Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 s302 |
| Tipo |
Journal Article |
