Book review : Reply to Holmes’s review of the "Social Construction of Anorexia Nervosa"


Autoria(s): Hepworth, Julie
Data(s)

01/06/2003

Resumo

It is always difficult to know what reviewers such as Colin Holmes (2001) want from a book. While he knows something of the claims that Gull was thought by some to be Jack the Ripper – an historical digression deliberately omitted from the book – Holmes has, it would seem, little understanding of the practice implications of Foucauldian analysis...

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/60207/

Publicador

SAGE Publications

Relação

DOI:10.1177/00048690030392016

Hepworth, Julie (2003) Book review : Reply to Holmes’s review of the "Social Construction of Anorexia Nervosa". Journal of Sociology, 39(2), pp. 194-195.

Fonte

School of Public Health & Social Work

Tipo

Journal Article