Australian copyright regimes and political economy of music
Contribuinte(s) |
Tschmuck, Peter Pearce, Philip L. Campbell, Steven |
---|---|
Data(s) |
30/04/2013
|
Resumo |
In this chapter I review the history of copyright in Australia through a singular and exemplary ruling of the Australian High Court made in 2012 and then relate that to the declining fortunes of Australian recorded music professionals. The case in point is Phonographic Performance Company [PPCA] of Australia Limited v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] HCA 8 (hereafter, HCA 8 2012). The case encapsulates the history of copyright law in Australia, with the judicial decision drawing substantive parts of its rationale from the Statute of Anne (8 Anne, c. 19, 1710), as well as copyright acts that regulated the Australian markets prior to 1968. More importantly the High Court decision serves to delineate some important political economic aspects of the recorded music professional in Australia and demonstrates Attali’s (1985) assertion that copyright is the mechanism through which composers are, by statute, literally excluded from capitalistic engagement as ‘productive labour’. |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
Relação |
DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-27898-3_2 Graham, Philip W. (2013) Australian copyright regimes and political economy of music. In Tschmuck, Peter, Pearce, Philip L., & Campbell, Steven (Eds.) Music Business and the Experience Economy : The Australasian Case. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany, pp. 11-26. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg |
Fonte |
Creative Industries Faculty; Music & Sound |
Palavras-Chave | #190407 Music Performance |
Tipo |
Book Chapter |