Setting aside default judgment - whether judgment regularly or irregularly entered - service under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s109X(1) - requirements for affadavit of service
Data(s) |
01/08/2009
|
---|---|
Resumo |
In Hill v Robertson Suspension Systems Pty Ltd [2009] QDC 165 McGill DCJ considered the procedural requirements for the service of originating process on a company, and for proving that service for the purpose of obtaining default judgment.The judge’s views adopt a strict and technical construction of the requirements for an affidavit of service under r 120(1)(b). Though clearly obiter, they may well affect the approach taken on applications to enter or set aside default judgments in the lower courts. Pending further judicial consideration of the issue, it is suggested the prudent course is to ensure that the deponent of an affidavit for service effected under s 109X(1)(a) of the Act deposes not only to the location of the registered office of the company but also, at a minimum, provides the source of that information. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Queensland Law Society Inc |
Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/58862/1/58862Auth.pdf http://www.qls.com.au/About_QLS/Queensland_Law_Society/Resources_publications/Newsletters_magazines/Proctor/Archive Jackson, Sheryl (2009) Setting aside default judgment - whether judgment regularly or irregularly entered - service under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s109X(1) - requirements for affadavit of service. Proctor, 29(7), pp. 42-43. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2009 Sheryl Jackson |
Fonte |
Faculty of Law |
Palavras-Chave | #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #setting aside default judgment #whether judgment regularly or irregularly entered #service under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s109X(1) #UCPR r120 #requirements of affidavit of service |
Tipo |
Journal Article |