Setting aside default judgment - whether judgment regularly or irregularly entered - service under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s109X(1) - requirements for affadavit of service


Autoria(s): Jackson, Sheryl
Data(s)

01/08/2009

Resumo

In Hill v Robertson Suspension Systems Pty Ltd [2009] QDC 165 McGill DCJ considered the procedural requirements for the service of originating process on a company, and for proving that service for the purpose of obtaining default judgment.The judge’s views adopt a strict and technical construction of the requirements for an affidavit of service under r 120(1)(b). Though clearly obiter, they may well affect the approach taken on applications to enter or set aside default judgments in the lower courts. Pending further judicial consideration of the issue, it is suggested the prudent course is to ensure that the deponent of an affidavit for service effected under s 109X(1)(a) of the Act deposes not only to the location of the registered office of the company but also, at a minimum, provides the source of that information.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/58862/

Publicador

Queensland Law Society Inc

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/58862/1/58862Auth.pdf

http://www.qls.com.au/About_QLS/Queensland_Law_Society/Resources_publications/Newsletters_magazines/Proctor/Archive

Jackson, Sheryl (2009) Setting aside default judgment - whether judgment regularly or irregularly entered - service under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s109X(1) - requirements for affadavit of service. Proctor, 29(7), pp. 42-43.

Direitos

Copyright 2009 Sheryl Jackson

Fonte

Faculty of Law

Palavras-Chave #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #setting aside default judgment #whether judgment regularly or irregularly entered #service under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s109X(1) #UCPR r120 #requirements of affidavit of service
Tipo

Journal Article