Supreme Court Act 1995 (Qld) s 253 – whether refusal to stay execution of costs is an order “as to costs only”
| Data(s) |
01/07/2009
|
|---|---|
| Resumo |
In Virgtel Ltd v Zabusky [2009] QCA 92 the Queensland Court of Appeal considered the scope of an order “as to costs only” within the meaning of s 253 of the Supreme Court Act 1995 (Qld) (‘the Act”). The Court also declined to accept submissions from one of the parties after oral hearing, and made some useful comments which serve as a reminder to practitioners of their obligations in that regard. |
| Formato |
application/pdf |
| Identificador | |
| Publicador |
Queensland Law Society Inc |
| Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/58861/2/58861.pdf Jackson, Sheryl (2009) Supreme Court Act 1995 (Qld) s 253 – whether refusal to stay execution of costs is an order “as to costs only”. Proctor, 29(6), p. 59. |
| Direitos |
Copyright 2009 Queensland Law Society |
| Fonte |
Faculty of Law |
| Palavras-Chave | #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #Supreme Court Act 1995 s 253 #whether refusal to stay execution of costs an order "as to costs only" #whether leave to appeal required #whether written submissions after oral hearing |
| Tipo |
Journal Article |
