Practice and Procedure : UCPR r 95


Autoria(s): Jackson, Sheryl
Data(s)

01/02/2010

Resumo

In Energex Limited v Sablatura [2009] QSC 356 the difficulty facing the applicant related not to its substantive rights, but to its ability to vindicate those rights without an effective respondent to the application. The case highlights issues that may confront an applicant or plaintiff in vindicating rights it may have against a person who is or becomes under a legal incapacity, if there is no-one other than the Public Trustee able to act as litigation guardian.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/58837/

Publicador

Queensland Law Society Inc.

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/58837/2/58837.pdf

http://www.qls.com.au/About_QLS/Queensland_Law_Society/Resources_publications/Newsletters_magazines/Proctor

Jackson, Sheryl (2010) Practice and Procedure : UCPR r 95. Proctor, 30(1), p. 55.

Direitos

Copyright 2010 The author

Fonte

Faculty of Law

Palavras-Chave #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #UCPR r 95 #litigation guardian for person under legal incapacity #appointment of public trustee
Tipo

Journal Article