Practice and Procedure : UCPR r 95
Data(s) |
01/02/2010
|
---|---|
Resumo |
In Energex Limited v Sablatura [2009] QSC 356 the difficulty facing the applicant related not to its substantive rights, but to its ability to vindicate those rights without an effective respondent to the application. The case highlights issues that may confront an applicant or plaintiff in vindicating rights it may have against a person who is or becomes under a legal incapacity, if there is no-one other than the Public Trustee able to act as litigation guardian. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Queensland Law Society Inc. |
Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/58837/2/58837.pdf http://www.qls.com.au/About_QLS/Queensland_Law_Society/Resources_publications/Newsletters_magazines/Proctor Jackson, Sheryl (2010) Practice and Procedure : UCPR r 95. Proctor, 30(1), p. 55. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2010 The author |
Fonte |
Faculty of Law |
Palavras-Chave | #180123 Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution #UCPR r 95 #litigation guardian for person under legal incapacity #appointment of public trustee |
Tipo |
Journal Article |