Prosecutorial guidelines for voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide : autonomy, public confidence and high quality decision-making


Autoria(s): White, Benjamin P.; Downie, Jocelyn
Data(s)

2012

Resumo

This article proposes offence-specific guidelines for how prosecutorial discretion should be exercised in cases of voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide. Similar guidelines have been produced in England and Wales but we consider them to be deficient in a number of respects, including that they lack a set of coherent guiding principles. In light of these concerns, we outline an approach to constructing alternative guidelines that begins with identifying three guiding principles that we argue are appropriate for this purpose: respect for autonomy, the need for high quality prosecutorial decision-making and the importance of public confidence in that decision-making.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/57059/

Publicador

Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/57059/2/Prosecutorial_guidelines_for_VE_and_AS_-_published_by_MULR.pdf

http://www.mulr.com.au/issues/36_2/36_2_9.pdf

White, Benjamin P. & Downie, Jocelyn (2012) Prosecutorial guidelines for voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide : autonomy, public confidence and high quality decision-making. Melbourne University Law Review, 36, pp. 656-705.

Direitos

Copyright 2012 Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc

Fonte

Faculty of Law; Australian Centre for Health Law Research; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180110 Criminal Law and Procedure #180119 Law and Society #Voluntary euthanasia #Assisted suicide #Prosecutorial discretion #Criminal prosecution #End of life decision making
Tipo

Journal Article