What’s in a name : Is there a right to terminate a contract for purchase of a unit if the name changes?


Autoria(s): Christensen, Sharon A.
Data(s)

01/09/2012

Resumo

The significance of the proposed name of a building to buyers of units off the plan has received recent attention in Queensland and the ACT with differing results. In Gough v South Sky Investments Pty Ltd the Queensland Court of Appeal concluded that the name of the building was not an essential term of the contract and rejected a claim by a number of buyers to terminate their contracts because of the change of name from Oracle to Peppers. In contrast, Rares J in the Federal Court decision of Madison Constructions Pty Ltd v Empire Building Group (ACT) Pty Ltd considered that the name of the building in a proposed development could potentially form the basis of misleading conduct about the association of the seller with a particular development corporation.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/56794/

Publicador

Lexis Nexis Butterworths

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/56794/1/What%27sInAName.pdf

Christensen, Sharon A. (2012) What’s in a name : Is there a right to terminate a contract for purchase of a unit if the name changes? Australian Property Law Bulletin, 26(10), pp. 153-156.

Direitos

Copyright 2012 Lexis Nexis

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180100 LAW #180124 Property Law (excl. Intellectual Property Law) #contract law #property law #building name
Tipo

Journal Article