Proportionality of sanctions under the WADA Code : CAS jurisprudence and the need for a strict approach


Autoria(s): Duffy, James
Data(s)

2013

Resumo

This article suggests that the issue of proportionality in anti-doping sanctions has been inconsistently dealt with by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). Given CAS’s pre-eminent role in interpreting and applying the World Anti-Doping Code under the anti-doping policies of its signatories, an inconsistent approach to the application of the proportionality principle will cause difficulties for domestic anti-doping tribunals seeking guidance as to the appropriateness of their doping sanctions.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/56521/

Publicador

Thomson Reuters

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/56521/2/56521.pdf

http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/category/australasian-dispute-resolution-journal/

Duffy, James (2013) Proportionality of sanctions under the WADA Code : CAS jurisprudence and the need for a strict approach. Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal, 24(1), pp. 26-40.

Direitos

Copyright 2013 Thomson Reuters

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180100 LAW #Sport #Drugs #Doping #Proportionality #Sanctions #Arbitration #World anti-doping code
Tipo

Journal Article