Proportionality of sanctions under the WADA Code : CAS jurisprudence and the need for a strict approach
Data(s) |
2013
|
---|---|
Resumo |
This article suggests that the issue of proportionality in anti-doping sanctions has been inconsistently dealt with by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). Given CAS’s pre-eminent role in interpreting and applying the World Anti-Doping Code under the anti-doping policies of its signatories, an inconsistent approach to the application of the proportionality principle will cause difficulties for domestic anti-doping tribunals seeking guidance as to the appropriateness of their doping sanctions. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Thomson Reuters |
Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/56521/2/56521.pdf http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/category/australasian-dispute-resolution-journal/ Duffy, James (2013) Proportionality of sanctions under the WADA Code : CAS jurisprudence and the need for a strict approach. Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal, 24(1), pp. 26-40. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2013 Thomson Reuters |
Fonte |
Faculty of Law; School of Law |
Palavras-Chave | #180100 LAW #Sport #Drugs #Doping #Proportionality #Sanctions #Arbitration #World anti-doping code |
Tipo |
Journal Article |