Using neo-Piagetian theory, formative in-Class tests and think alouds to better understand student thinking : a preliminary report on computer programming
Data(s) |
03/12/2012
|
---|---|
Resumo |
It is acknowledged around the world that many university students struggle with learning to program (McCracken et al., 2001; McGettrick et al., 2005). In this paper, we describe how we have developed a research programme to systematically study and incrementally improve our teaching. We have adopted a research programme with three elements: (1) a theory that provides an organising framework for defining the type of phenomena and data of interest, (2) data on how the class as a whole performs on formative assessment tasks that are framed from within the organising framework, and (3) data from one-on-one think aloud sessions, to establish why students struggle with some of those in-class formative assessment tasks. We teach introductory computer programming, but this three-element structure of our research is applicable to many areas of engineering education research. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/55828/1/Teague2012.pdf http://www.aaee.com.au/conferences/2012/documents/abstracts/aaee2012-submission-22.pdf Teague, Donna M., Corney, Malcolm W., Fidge, Colin J., Roggenkamp, Michael G., Ahadi, Alireza, & Lister, Raymond (2012) Using neo-Piagetian theory, formative in-Class tests and think alouds to better understand student thinking : a preliminary report on computer programming. In Proceedings of 2012 Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE) Annual Conference, Melbourne, Vic. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2012 please consult the authors |
Fonte |
School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science; Science & Engineering Faculty |
Palavras-Chave | #080300 COMPUTER SOFTWARE #programming #neo-Piagetian #think aloud #HERN |
Tipo |
Conference Paper |