Enhancing capacity for 'systematic' thinking in public health


Autoria(s): Hall, Belinda J.; Armstrong, Rebecca; Francis, Daniel P.; Doyle, Jodie; Baker, Philip R. A.
Data(s)

2010

Resumo

The concept of being evidence based or evidence informed is widely acknowledged as an important component of decision-making. It is perhaps most universally referred to in medicine, however has extended into many other disciplines over the past decade, including public health. Evidence-based public health has been defined as the ‘conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of communities and populations in the domain of health protection, disease prevention, health maintenance and improvement (health promotion)’.1 More recent literature favours the use of the term evidence informed over evidence based to acknowledge the varying influences on decisions in this complex field.2,3 Evidence-informed activities in any discipline require a specific set of skills in critical thinking. These skills include identifying the questions to be resolved, collecting relevant evidence, and assessing, synthesizing and distilling evidence in a way that can inform the set of activities to be undertaken as a result.

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/55750/

Publicador

Oxford University Press

Relação

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdq086

Hall, Belinda J., Armstrong, Rebecca, Francis, Daniel P., Doyle, Jodie, & Baker, Philip R. A. (2010) Enhancing capacity for 'systematic' thinking in public health. Journal of Public Health, 32(4), pp. 582-585.

Fonte

Faculty of Health; School of Public Health & Social Work

Palavras-Chave #111700 PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH SERVICES #130200 CURRICULUM AND PEDAGOGY #systematic reviews #evidence based practice #training #public health workforce
Tipo

Journal Article