Attribution of words versus attribution of responsibilities : Academic plagiarism and university practice
Data(s) |
11/10/2012
|
---|---|
Resumo |
This paper examines a case of academic plagiarism and the subsequent treatment of the issues across several academic institutions. It calls for academic leaders in universities to act on what constitutes a serious breach of standards, engendered in part by broader institutional norms and values promoting the need for publications in a ‘publish or perish’ environment. While universities often promote high-sounding ideals and would generally wish to be seen to uphold high academic standards, it is argued that silence and complicity surround the way in which instances of plagiarism in academic publications are often dealt with. Actions (and inaction) by academic leaders in universities in dealing with cases of academic plagiarism speak volumes in terms of the values academic institutions profess, and those they actually uphold. The paper prompts readers to consider the need for a more consistent and proactive stance on the part of their own institutions to exercise ethical leadership in identifying and addressing academic plagiarism when it occurs. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Sage Publications |
Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/55572/2/55572.pdf DOI:10.1177/1350508412448857 Luke, Belinda G. & Kearins, Kate (2012) Attribution of words versus attribution of responsibilities : Academic plagiarism and university practice. Organization, 19(6), pp. 881-889. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2012 Sage Publications |
Fonte |
QUT Business School; School of Accountancy |
Palavras-Chave | #150000 COMMERCE MANAGEMENT TOURISM AND SERVICES #plagiarism #academics #academia #university practice #responsibilities #HERN |
Tipo |
Journal Article |