Does section 420A impose ‘strict liability’ upon controllers for acts or omissions of agents and experts?
Data(s) |
01/06/2012
|
---|---|
Resumo |
This article addresses in depth the question of whether section 420A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) imposes ‘strict liability’ upon a controller for the failure of an agent or expert to take reasonable care. The weight of existing authority appears to suggest that controllers are liable under s 420A for the carelessness of their agents or expert advisers. However, a closer analysis of the text of the provision and relevant Australian and UK case law demonstrates that this aspect of the statutory construction of s 420A remains very much an open question. This article ultimately contends for a construction of s 420A which requires a controller to adequately supervise and scrutinise, but which does not render a blameless controller strictly liable for all careless acts and omissions of agents and expert advisers. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Publicador |
Thomson Reuters (Australia/NZ) |
Relação |
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/50936/1/50936_acceptedVer.pdf http://www.thomsonreuters.com.au/insolvency-law-journal-online-westlaw-au/productdetail/97173 Wellard, Mark Norman (2012) Does section 420A impose ‘strict liability’ upon controllers for acts or omissions of agents and experts? Insolvency Law Journal, 20(2), pp. 124-143. |
Direitos |
Copyright 2012 Thomson Reuters |
Fonte |
Faculty of Law; School of Law |
Palavras-Chave | #180109 Corporations and Associations Law #Corporation Act 2001 #Section 420A #strict liability #Australian and UK Case Law |
Tipo |
Journal Article |