Does section 420A impose ‘strict liability’ upon controllers for acts or omissions of agents and experts?


Autoria(s): Wellard, Mark Norman
Data(s)

01/06/2012

Resumo

This article addresses in depth the question of whether section 420A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) imposes ‘strict liability’ upon a controller for the failure of an agent or expert to take reasonable care. The weight of existing authority appears to suggest that controllers are liable under s 420A for the carelessness of their agents or expert advisers. However, a closer analysis of the text of the provision and relevant Australian and UK case law demonstrates that this aspect of the statutory construction of s 420A remains very much an open question. This article ultimately contends for a construction of s 420A which requires a controller to adequately supervise and scrutinise, but which does not render a blameless controller strictly liable for all careless acts and omissions of agents and expert advisers.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/50936/

Publicador

Thomson Reuters (Australia/NZ)

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/50936/1/50936_acceptedVer.pdf

http://www.thomsonreuters.com.au/insolvency-law-journal-online-westlaw-au/productdetail/97173

Wellard, Mark Norman (2012) Does section 420A impose ‘strict liability’ upon controllers for acts or omissions of agents and experts? Insolvency Law Journal, 20(2), pp. 124-143.

Direitos

Copyright 2012 Thomson Reuters

Fonte

Faculty of Law; School of Law

Palavras-Chave #180109 Corporations and Associations Law #Corporation Act 2001 #Section 420A #strict liability #Australian and UK Case Law
Tipo

Journal Article